The Xiaomi Redmi 13, a $180 4G mid-ranger, has undergone a comprehensive battery life test. While the phone’s 5,030mAh battery shows promise, the Helio G91 Ultra chipset’s efficiency, built on an older 12nm process, presents some challenges. Here are the detailed results of the battery test.
Xiaomi Redmi 13 Battery Test Results
Video Playback
The Redmi 13 performed admirably in video playback, lasting 15 hours. This is impressive given its large 6.79” IPS LCD screen (90Hz). Although the display’s maximum brightness is 550 nits, our test was conducted at a standard brightness of 200 nits for consistency.
Voice Calls
The phone also excelled in the voice call test, recording 36 hours and 22 minutes. This indicates strong performance for basic phone functionality, despite the older modem technology.
Active Use Scores
| Device | Battery | Video Playback | Voice Calls | Web Browsing | Gaming |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaomi Redmi 13 | 5,030 mAh | 15:00h | 36:22h | 7:18h | 5:29h |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G | 5,000 mAh | 11:52h | 23:52h | 11:07h | 13:55h |
| Xiaomi Poco C65 | 5,000 mAh | 11:31h | 45:15h | 11:07h | 15:36h |
| Honor 90 | 5,000 mAh | 10:28h | 25:00h | 9:47h | 12:41h |
| Samsung Galaxy A25 | 5,000 mAh | 10:19h | 25:00h | 8:11h | 7:08h |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro | 5,100 mAh | 10:16h | 26:31h | 9:24h | 11:50h |
| Xiaomi Poco X6 | 5,100 mAh | 10:11h | 27:44h | 9:21h | 11:45h |
Comparative Analysis
Redmi 13 vs. Competitors
- Redmi Note 13 Pro & Poco X6: Both 5G phones with 5,100mAh batteries placed lower in overall active use scores compared to the Redmi 13. Their lower call and video test times contributed to this, although their gaming and web browsing scores were slightly better.
- Samsung Galaxy A25: While the Galaxy A25 performed worse overall (10:19h), it achieved better web browsing (8:11h) and gaming (7:08h) scores than the Redmi 13.
- Honor 90: This device matched the Redmi 13’s active use score (10:28h) but excelled in web browsing and gaming performance. However, it comes at a higher price point.
- Redmi Note 13 4G: Despite its smaller 6.67” OLED display and similar battery capacity, it had lower call and video test results but outperformed in web and gaming tests.
- Poco C65: Featuring the Helio G85 chipset, this phone showcased a standout call time of 45:15h and slightly better video playback than the Redmi 13. The lower screen resolution aided in web browsing performance but didn’t significantly impact gaming.
Conclusion
The Xiaomi Redmi 13 demonstrates strong battery life in specific areas, such as video playback and voice calls, but falls short in web browsing and gaming due to the less efficient Helio G91 Ultra chipset. Adjust your usage patterns using the Active use score sliders to get a more personalized assessment of its battery performance. Stay tuned for the detailed review soon.
ALSO READ:
